Search for: "SUITS v. STATE"
Results 6581 - 6600
of 32,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2008, 11:55 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:05 am
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Tucker v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:41 am
Sotomayor asked Yarger whether the closer case is not Nebraska v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
The Parkers sued Dillard in a separate suit in a Travis County Probate Court, alleging that he had breached his fiduciary duty to them. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm
I was checking the newly released opinions from the United States Supreme Court and Taylor v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:59 am
United States, 510 F.3d 1191, 1195 n. 5 (10th Cir.2007) (collecting cases); Kraft v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 8:01 pm
” The case at issue is a Ninth Circuit case called SolarCity Corporation v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:01 am
Becerra (challenge to California law requiring “crisis pregnancy centers” to convey state-prescribed messages), Lozman v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 1:30 pm
., P.C. v Travelers Prop. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
In Crespin v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 8:30 am
" The case is National Federation of the Blind v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 5:34 am
Infringement Action Waives PTAB Immunity State-affiliated entities enjoy immunity from suit in federal courts under the 11th amendment. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:38 am
The United States eventually intervened in the case, a typical event in a qui tam suit, and as the trial progressed, the issues in the suit were narrowed. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
Rabito, 714 So. 2d 1226, 1230 (La. 1998) (“this provision requires that a patient ‘must provoke a medical review panel and receive an opinion from it before he can file suit in a court of law’”) (quoting Everett v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 10:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied Ohio State University's petition for rehearing en banc in Snyder-Hill v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:15 am
Younger v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:21 pm
The taxpayer filed suit contending that the standard apportionment formula did not fairly represent the extent of its business activity in the state and violated the Due Process Clause and Commerce Clause. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 5:15 am
In Moore v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
§ 1983, which includes a threshold requirement that the defendant must have acted "under color of state law" in order to be subject to suit. [read post]
