Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 6581 - 6600
of 10,141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2012, 4:29 pm
Ioli Trust v. [read post]
COA Opinion: Courts must consider a minor defendant’s age when sentencing him to life without parole
16 Nov 2012, 2:32 pm
The United States Supreme Court held, in Miller v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:14 am
In the most recent decision, the Arbitration Panel specifically found that: Claimants are recent immigrants to the United States and they had very limited investment experience. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 8:27 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 8:57 pm
Today I preview Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:07 am
Your case will mostly be affected by recent published opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 8:03 am
to the United States permanently. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 7:28 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
Now that the country will resume its path to deliberate degradation and decay, it is time to return for a look at the parallel path which the Episcopal Church in the United States of America (ECUSA) is taking. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 1:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 5:00 pm
Developing countries seeking access to the economic prosperity promised by international trade long argued that joining the WTO meant they had to follow rules that the United States and European countries could flaunt. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 1:34 am
In SIX Group AG v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
United States, 156 U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 4:18 pm
The Plaintiffs sued the Defendants in the United States for damages for the wrongful death of the late Ms. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am
The short answer is yes. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
This argument was raised in one case dealing with §602, and the court, confronted with the argument against plaintiff’s hair care product labels, said, “Catch phrases, mottos, slogans and short advertising expressions are not copyrightable. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:12 pm
The United States was therefore answerable to its Allies for all activities occurring there. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:52 am
This “contraception mandate” has generated a huge outcry from some religious leaders, most notably the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. [read post]
