Search for: "Smith v. State" Results 6581 - 6600 of 10,996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 25 Conference) Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
 After Mr Harris had provided a review of the facts, he handed over to Richard Miller QC, who started by drawing attention to previous House of Lord decisions (Mulkerrin’s [2003] 1 WLR 1937 (HL); Vervaeke v Smith [1983] AC 145) in which the Court held that res judicata is a form of estoppel that should apply “even though the decision may be wrong”. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:58 am by David Gans
”  Jack argues that the back and forth in these briefs, and particularly the agreement that Romer v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 3:50 pm by Jeff Gittins
In 2011, the Utah Supreme Court issued the Jensen v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:25 pm by Christa Culver
MittsDocket: 10-1000Issue(s): (1) Whether the State of Ohio offends due process by using the same penalty-phase jury instruction affirmed by this Court in Smith v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 11:25 am
  Ms Joanna Smith QC sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court was faced with a similar argument as Huawei's and ZTE's in Vannin Capital PCC v RBOS Shareholders Action Group Limited [2019] EWHC 1617 (Ch). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
 | Criminalisation of IP and economics | Keeping count of blocked websites in the UK |Birkin Bags | Patentability of user interface designs in Germany |Smith & Nephew v ConvaTec | Report on IPEC litigation |does Twitter have a future? [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:50 am
Here's another guest post by Reed Smith's own Kevin Hara, this time about a recent Texas case holding that health care providers involved in clinical trials are still protected by a state medical malpractice statute, and thus were fraudulently joined. [read post]