Search for: "State v. C. S." Results 6581 - 6600 of 37,717
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In my 2017 edits to this text, I provided some background to attempts to introduce similar legislation in Canada, including Bill C-508: An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act (genetic characteristics) in 2014, a private member’s bill which passed First Reading and reinstated in 2015 as Bill C-445), and Bill S-201 in 2013, which was referred to the Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights on June 16, 2014. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm by Francis Pileggi
Class V Stockholders Litigation, case number 2018-0816, in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 5:24 pm by Robert L. Abell
It also appears to run afoul of the analysis in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has a post “Parliaments and the GDPR” concerned the CJEU case, Case C-272/19 VK v Land Hessen (EU:C:2020:535). [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:27 am by Eleonora Rosati
This, in a nutshell, is the question which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had been required to answer in Constantin Film v YouTube, C-264/19.The referral, which Germany’s Federal Court of Justice had made, focused on the interpretation of Article 8(2)(a) of the Enforcement Directive, a piece of EU legislation adopted in 2004.The background national proceedings had originated from the refusal, by YouTube and its parent company Google, to provide… [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
These are real risks which have to be weighed against the benefits of self-regulation including independence from the state and the application of valuable expertise and experience to the realities of practice. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Finally, Cook Children's notes that even if the court strikes down Section 166.046, it alternatively has the authority to stop Tinslee's life-sustaining treatment under 166.045(c) and 166.051. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
To date, though the pandemic is a global health and economic phenomenon, the pandemic-related securities litigation activity has been limited to the United States. [read post]