Search for: "State v. Powers" Results 6581 - 6600 of 36,858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2014, 5:21 am by Timothy P. Flynn
"  Professor Mortenson asserted that the couple was properly married following Judge Friedman's ruling and that status cannot be undone, even if the SCOTUS reinstates Michigan's constitutional ban on gay marriage.Ever since the 5-4 SCOTUS ruling in United States v Windsor in 2012, same-sex marriage advocates and the ACLU have argued in lower courts across the nation that the case applies to states' power to ban same-sex marriage; the… [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 8:01 am by Amanda Frost
On November 8, the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:12 am by Dennis Westlind
This morning the United States Supreme Court issued a highly-anticipated decision in New Process Steel v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:13 am
Vicarious liability for sexual abuse The Supreme Court of Canada in Doe v Bennett ruled the Catholic Church could be held vicariously liable by sexual abuse by one of its Priests: “First, the Bishop provided Bennett with the opportunity to abuse his power. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:00 am by Unknown
It is whether the United States circa 2023, and for the reasonably foreseeable future, can expect to achieve better results by curtailing the power or changing the composition of the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:00 am by Record on Appeal
On Tuesday, July 17, 2012, the HSBA Appellate Section hosted a distinguished panel to discuss the United States Supreme Court’s recent healthcare decision, otherwise known as National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 7:21 pm
A spokeswoman for V&S stated, "The reason for this is that we consider there is a risk of confusion. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 1:37 am by CMS
Opt-out mechanisms are powerful procedural devices for aggregating claims which are individually low in value, and where there is limited incentive for class members to participate in “opt-in” mechanisms. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 9:36 am by David Pozen
More recently, David Super has emerged as the academy’s leading critic of the “Convention of States” campaign and of Article V convention drives in general. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 8:04 am
On 12th November the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in Limit No. 2 Limited v AXA. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 3:29 pm by Mary Whisner
The presentation will include a review of the federal court litigation filed in Seattle that eventually led to the United States Supreme Court 2006 landmark Hamdan v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:28 pm by NARF
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html United States v. [read post]