Search for: "State v. Stephens."
Results 6581 - 6600
of 7,112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Instead, most states authorize the attorney general of the state to oversee and enforce charitable trusts. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
v=eTnHjYOFuB4"} ) CITIZENS UNITED WON'T GET SECOND LOOK Arizona's law wasn't all the high court tackled. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
Aidan O’Neill QC argues that following the case of Andy Wightman MSP and others v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU it is clear that the Article 50 notification can be withdrawn at any time. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am
In a lengthy article in the New York Times, followed by similar pieces in various other outlets, the Trump campaign and its surrogates — most prominently former White House Domestic Policy Counsel Advisor Stephen Miller — laid out an agenda even more virulently anti-immigrant than the one they pursued with great vigor starting in 2017. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 6:19 pm
The landmark case of Guggenheimer v Ginzberg sets forth the guideline that whether plaintiff has stated a cause of action, thereby defeating defendants' motions, the court will consider whether the plaintiff has a cause of action rather than whether he has properly stated one. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:06 am
But last week, one of them – Justice Stephen G. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 5:54 pm
However, on 17 September 1998, the petition was withdrawn by defendant-wife, and the Court issued an order stating that the withdrawal was with prejudice to the petitioner. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:03 pm
The landmark case of Guggenheimer v Ginzberg sets forth the guideline that whether plaintiff has stated a cause of action, thereby defeating defendants' motions, the court will consider whether the plaintiff has a cause of action rather than whether he has properly stated one. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
Instead, Judge Kavanaugh read the Supreme Court’s Heller decision and its 2010 decision in McDonald v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 7:28 am
Justice Stephen Breyer reacted similarly. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:22 am
El Camino Res., LTD. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm
(Indeed, the Ninth Circuit recently held in Oracle v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 8:15 pm
A private detective has only the right of a private person with respect to arrest, Dohery v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 8:13 pm
Nursing Home v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
A 1978 Supreme Court case, Monell v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
When it comes to other issues involving the separation of church and state, the administration supported the state of Maine’s right to refuse funding for religious education in a recent Supreme Court case. [read post]
19 May 2012, 7:53 am
Other than his position as Head of State and as President of the ruling party, President Zuma as a citizen has a right to human dignity, which is enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic. [read post]
