Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 6581 - 6600
of 15,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2016, 1:20 am
" eBay Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:44 pm
Comparative and transnational law serve as natural nexus points for vigorous and sometimes interdisciplinary approaches to the study of state and non-state law systems, along with their linkages and interactions. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 11:19 am
But today I had a moment, so I thought I’d pass along State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
See Duren; State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
See Duren; State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Abercrombie & Fitch, (June 10, 2016).Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, Review of Beyond Church and State by Matthew Scherer, (Augustinian Studies 47:1 (2016) 114–118).Danieli Evans, Religious Objections to the Death Penalty after Hobby Lobby, (Stanford Law & Policy Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2015).Abner S. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
An infantile child prank becomes a felony charge for the perpetrator.Last year, Justice Scalia noted in in his partial concurrence in Kansas v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
The case arises from how the university arranged for removal of the students from their equine studies placement. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Writing for the Brookings Institution, Lisa V. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
Other financial firms should study Morgan Stanley’s reaction and take careful notes – because what Morgan Stanley experienced can, and will, happen to all of them. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:57 am
He noted that the four economic studies upon which the FCC relies did not actually support the agency’s conclusion, and the author of three such studies instead filed comments opposing the rule — one of three former FCC chief economists whose comments opposing the ban were not discussed in the final rule. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 12:34 pm
The post State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 12:34 pm
The post State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 5:16 am
Facts: This case (Mednick v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 5:16 am
Facts: This case (Mednick v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:34 pm
Florida (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act – Good Faith Negotiations) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.htmlWhite v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 1:33 pm
” Second, Justice Valihura stated that the Chancery Court’s rejection of the Caris’ directors’ trial testimony, and attribution of “hindsight bias,” was improper: “In my view, this Court should be skeptical of court rulings predicated upon social science studies, particularly where, as here, such theories impact a trial court’s own post-trial impressions of the testimony offered. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:02 am
As observers might have predicted from the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
