Search for: "v. " Results 6581 - 6600 of 493,822
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 3:33 am by sally
Regina (McGetrick) v Parole Board and another [2012] EWHC 882 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 114 “When considering and making its substantive recommendation on the question of the early release or recall of prisoners on licence following a reference to it by the Secretary of State for Justice, the Parole Board was ‘dealing with the case’ within the meaning of section 239(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and was therefore required to consider all the documents given to it by… [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The reply brief on the merits was filed on August 21, 2012 in in Rose v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:38 am by sally
Sharma and another v Simposh Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1383; [2011] WLR (D) 341 “Property in a deposit could pass to the vendor notwithstanding that the sale contract was void for non-compliance with the formal requirements of section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, provided that the payment was not intended to be conditional upon completion of the transaction; and the vendor could retain the deposit if the purchaser had received the expected benefit.”… [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 2:22 am by sally
Media Protection Services Ltd v Crawford and another [2012] EWHC 2373 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 250 “The laying of an information by a director of a private limited company, acting for reward on behalf of a client in the course of its business, constituted acting as a solicitor within the meaning and in breach of section 20 of the Solicitors Act 1974 and carrying on a reserved legal activity, namely the conduct of litigation, contrary to the Legal Services Act 2007, with the result that… [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:36 pm
On June 20, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:22 pm
On May 31, 2011 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:00 am
I am going to write a follow-up to my analysis of the Fifth Circuit's recent Leonard v. [read post]