Search for: "*doe, Matter of" Results 6601 - 6620 of 140,216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2010, 3:39 pm by Gene Quinn
Putting aside my disdain for the Supreme Court stepping into patent matters of any kind, what does seem clear is that the Supreme Court wants to pretend that patents are the same as any other area of law and the same processes and procedures pertaining to other areas of law apply equally to the patent world. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
We've been busy with other matters but need to turn to a truly remarkable opinion, In re Revlon Shareholders Litigation, another bit of evidence that VC Laster does not intend to be a shrinking violet on the Delaware Chancery Court. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 10:11 pm
Why does it matter how much my room mate makes as we split 50/50. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 4:18 pm
But, if the issue of who gets the rings does come up in your divorce, here's what most judges will probably do. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Matt Maurer
In short: – a self-represented litigant does not have an automatic right to costs; – the matter remains fully within the discretion of the trial judge; – to be considered eligible for costs, the self-represented litigant must demonstrate that they devoted time and effort to do work ordinarily done by a lawyer retained to conduct the litigation and in doing so incurred an opportunity cost by foregoing remunerative activity; – self-represented litigants should… [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by chrisstevelaw
After all, your attorney does not get paid unless your case is won. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:12 am by Ray Dowd
  Does it matter that the pose and costume is part of an ancient hula tradition? [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm by Eric Lipman
Uh, does somebody want to tell her that, if all goes according to plan, she will, in a matter of years, find herself married to an actual lawyer? [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 11:33 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
The fact that Doe denied involvement with trading porn files did not matter at this stage in the litigation. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am by Jason Rantanen
See,  77 FR 30197, 30198 (explaining that randomness in the pilot was necessary to “ensure that the resulting assessment is not skewed by consideration of registrations with particular criteria, and that implementation of the rules does not create an unfair burden on specific types of trademark owners”). [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 8:51 am
Note that the United States Supreme Court has granted cert. on this issue in another case— if you want to preserve the claim, you can use this ACLU cert. petition filed in that matter for reference. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:16 am by Juan C. Antúnez
So if rule 1.420 applies to this case, the trial court was barred as a matter of law from continuing to involve itself in the trust’s affairs — no matter what it’s prior order said about retained jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 11:11 am
Lin does nothing, however, to explain what type of comparative information he would actually require in labels. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am by PaulKostro
. __ (2012), A-48-10, 067006, January 23, 2012: Absent a valid excuse, a person who does not comply with a subpoena to testify may be held in contempt. [read post]