Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 9,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2009, 8:32 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:27 pm
” In Amgen v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm
Cooper was ready with a precedent of his own, the Court’s 1982 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 10:13 pm
See generally United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm
In the TMA Pai case, an 11-judge bench of the Supreme Court held that the State could not require unaided private colleges to implement the State’s reservation policies or provide free education. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
That provision was also challenged in Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The EEOC Determined in Mia Macy v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:49 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:33 pm
Ohio; Cox v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:38 pm
In the meantime, all eyes are currently turned toward the pending state Supreme Court case in Cal Fire Local 2881 v. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 9:59 am
The Temple asserted claims under the CFAA, the cybersquatting statute, as well as under state law. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:21 am
The High Court - through Moses LJ - briefly noted that the UK was bound not to defeat the object and purpose of the Convention under Article 18 of the VCLT, but that was of course beside the point because even that limited obligation could not exist vis-à-vis Mongolia, that state not having accepted the Convention in any way. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 8:11 am
The 1946 Convention outlines the immunities and privileges of the UN as an organization, as well as those of three groups of individuals: representatives of member states, UN officials (i.e., permanent staff), and experts on missions for the UN. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:00 am
Not that PLIVA v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
On May 12, 2020, the New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate Division in New Jersey Transit Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:00 am
The case went to the Supreme Court of Canada and in Potter v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 8:56 am
In Gibb v. [read post]
