Search for: "Branch v. State" Results 6601 - 6620 of 8,127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2010, 6:50 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Section 133.002 states, "If a branch of the armed services issues a certificate declaring a person dead, the date of death is presumed to have occurred for all purposes as stated in the certificate. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm by Anna Christensen
The following three cases were consolidated by the Court: Title: PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 8:09 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
This is Part I in a series discussing the recent case of Reliable Fire Equipment v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:54 am
Responding to Freedom of Information requestsMcKethan v NY-NJ Port Authority, Appellate Division, First Dept., 277 AD2d 15William McKethan obtained a court order pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law directing the New York-New Jersey Port Authority [New York Branch] to provide him with certain information. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:20 am by Gary L. Francione
The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) has apparently filed a class action suit against Perdue Farms: The Humane Society of the United States announced the filing of a class action lawsuit against the nation’s third-largest poultry producer, Perdue Farms, over the company’s alleged false advertising of factory farmed chicken products as “humane. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 2:34 pm by Jon Sands
At another time, the court stated that the grand jury was a branch of the U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:48 am by Rosalind English
Noting the very high threshold for review imposed by the Wednesbury test (see criticisms of this by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Daly [2001] UKHL 26,[2001] 2 AC 532  and the Strasbourg Court in Smith and Grady v United Kingdom (1999) 29 EHRR 493, para. 138) the Committee considered that the application of a “proportionality principle” by the courts in E&W could provide an adequate standard of… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:09 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  I’m not an expert on it, but I know of no appellate opinion holding as much, and for a good reason, too: if a claim is committed to the political branches, then in the common-law context the political branches can displace it. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:56 am by Elie Mystal
Judicial conservatism was once principally defined as a philosophy of deference to the democratically elected branches of government. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:53 am
So reminds the Second Department, Appellate Division: The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the appellant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' third cause of action insofar as asserted against it for failure to state a cause of action (see Light v Light, 64 AD3d 633). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am by David Doniger
When the case is heard next year, the states and other plaintiffs will press the Court to keep the courthouse doors open until and unless the executive branch actually protects the American people by setting Clean Air Act standards that curb the emissions of existing plants. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 10:27 am by Kathryn McCann - Guest
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Milner v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
Finn.Finn, John E.Chantilly, VA : Teaching Co., c2006.KF4750 .F56 2006 DVDCivil RightsKF372 .J36 2010Root and branch : Charles Hamilton Houston, Thurgood Marshall, and the struggle to end segregation / Rawn James, Jr.James, Rawn.New York, N.Y. : Bloomsbury Press, 2010.Civil RightsKF4155 .S77 2010Mendez v. [read post]