Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 51,426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2009, 7:59 am
A lot of people lost a lot of money, many of them ordinary people saving for their children's college or retirement or those already in retirement. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Most people would agree that cases should not be dismissed where there is no authority to support the dismissal. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:20 am
ACLU v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
—, 144 S.Ct. 756 (March 15, 2024), considered with a companion case O’Connor-Radcliffe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 11:06 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
As millions of people eagerly await next week’s Supreme Court action in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
Case Law: Tulisa Contostavlos v Michael Mendahun and others, “sex tape” privacy injunction continued
1 Apr 2012, 4:21 am
There is an interesting footnote to the case. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 2:28 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:18 am
The much anticipated preemption case, Wyeth v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 9:14 am
Cash indisputably plays a significant role as circumstantial evidence in narcotics cases (citations omitted), however, and we conclude that 'an objective observer with the same knowledge concerning the suspect as the police had would conclude that the [question of the narcotics officer concerning the ownership of cash found in the kitchen during the execution of the search warrant] was reasonably likely to elicit [an incriminating] response' (People v Ferro, 63… [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 6:46 am
Court of Appeals who decided this case. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 6:46 am
Court of Appeals who decided this case. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:50 pm
In Edwin Cheek v. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 5:55 am
The burden is on the moving party to prove its case. [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:46 am
By Eric Goldman Zango has filed its reply brief in Zango v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 1:01 pm
Cruz-Camey v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:00 am
Today's case is a textbook example of why SOPA--and the things it stood for--were so objectionable to so many people. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:43 am
The Court granted certiorari in one new case, Bailey v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm
See Kohl v. [read post]
19 May 2018, 12:09 pm
It would have been preferable to give the Apple v. [read post]
