Search for: "County v. State" Results 6601 - 6620 of 33,687
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2022, 11:32 am by Giles Peaker
Behjat v Crescent Trustees Ltd (2022) UKUT 115 (LC) UTLC We’ve previously seen some messes happen where the First Tier Tribunal judges purport to exercise their jurisdiction as county court judges, for example here. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 am by Unknown
Seneca County, New York (Ad Valorem Property Taxes)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlInterest of A.M. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 am by Native American Rights Fund
Seneca County, New York (Ad Valorem Property Taxes)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlInterest of A.M. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:21 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Cieslak (Tribal Land; Tribal Sovereign Immunity)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.htmlLewis v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:33 pm by Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP
Even the Commonwealth’s brief states that although authorized pretextual stops are “the state of the law, it is concerning and does not appear consistent with the values espoused by the highest court in our Commonwealth or the will of people of Suffolk County. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm by Ronald Mann
  The Washington Supreme Court ruled for the landowners based on an “in-rem” exception that it discerned in the Supreme Court’s decision in County of Yakima v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:25 am by Michael L. Saile, Jr., Esq.
The Superior Court ruled against the Mercer County NJ prosecutor by stating that the 20-minute observation rule was required by State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:50 pm
United States, 498 U.S. 192, 193 (1991); United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, plaintiff's proposed amended complaint sufficiently states a claim for legal [*2]malpractice (Deitz v Kelleher & Flink, 232 AD2d 943 [1996]; see also Tenzer, Greenblatt, Fallon & Kaplan v Ellenberg, 199 AD2d 45 [1993]). [read post]