Search for: "DANIEL v. DANIEL" Results 6601 - 6620 of 7,726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
See the several books concerning such methods and management written by, Richard and Daniel Susskind, plus the other authorities, all set out in the “further suggested reading&rd [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Columbia University Press, c2010.Constitutional LawKF228.G528 J64 2010Gibbons v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Copyright protection expiration in China: lifetime plus fifty (IP Dragon) EU experience and practice must show China the way concerning IPR protection at exhibitions (IP Dragon) Comparison between IPR in China relevant provisions of Foreign Trade Law 2004 and 1994 (IP Dragon) Thesis and publications about IPR in China (IP Dragon) 2009: New trends in China’s judicial protection of intellectual property rights (China Law Insight) Best practices in technology transfer and IP licensing in… [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 2:16 am by INFORRM
Deisenroth, Daniel and Manjeer, Utsav and Sohail, Zarak and Tadelis, Steven and Wernerfelt, Nils, Digital Advertising and Market Structure: Implications for Privacy Regulation (2024) NBER Working Paper No. w32726. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 12 November 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Ameyaw v McGoldrick [2020] EWHC 3035 (QB). [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
No. 22550, 2008-Ohio-3873 (petition for writ of prohibition dismissed) In re: State of Ohio, ex rel., Daniel Watkins II, 2nd Dist. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 4:03 am by Peter Mahler
The point indirectly was brought home by Professor Daniel Kleinberger’s recent article for the ABA’s Business Law Section in which he dissects last year’s decision by a Connecticut appellate panel in Manere v Collins interpreting that state’s Revised Uniform LLC Act which expressly includes oppression as one of the grounds for judicial dissolution. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:54 am by INFORRM
Media Lawyer Daniel Burnett argues that the court failed to consider the open court principle. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
” And in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, Daniel Henninger finds it “possible that the Kavanaugh Court may give everyone a chance to step back from the political cliff. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:59 am by INFORRM
  A statement of the principle was set out in the case of Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm by Daniel Isenberg
MXB v East Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust [2012] EWHC 3279 (QB)  - Mr Justice Tugendhat updates his own guidance on child anonymity orders in social media age. [read post]