Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 11,203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2013, 9:32 am
What Salinas v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:21 am
But as his recent opinions in Alleyne v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
Lubin, 122 F. 240 (1903).See Mazer v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:22 am
In Sedlock et al v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 7:42 am
Whether domain name registrants are cybersquatting on the trademark depends on a number of factors that are discussed in Imagine Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 2:42 pm
The Court had taken on the case of Salinas v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm
NEW 4:21: Lyle has analysis (which includes a Plain English summary) of the decision in FTC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
The five-to-three decision in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 10:10 am
The decision in the case of Arizona v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:28 pm
We bring to your attention a recent decision of the UK Supreme Court in Ust-Kamenogorsk- Hydropower Plant JSC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
In American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
"Treaty Interpretation before the Supreme Court," Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol. 2, no. 1 (2013) [free full-text] - In part, discusses R v Secretary and the interpretation of Article 32 of the Refugee Convention. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:13 pm
The Court continues to build on its recent record of unanimous decisions, ruling in Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:53 pm
A case granted for next Term, Burt v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
Walker Estate v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 10:44 am
He also has a “Plain English” version of that post, while Dan Stein collects Twitter reactions to the Myriad decision. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:59 am
” • • • Redefining Free Culture was originally posted on Copyhype • • • FootnotesSee, for example, The Ethics of Consent, pp. 45-51 (Oxford University Press 2010), citing Thomas Hobbes, Adam Smith, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill.See, for example, Lynch v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 12:45 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom ruled in Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC (Appellant) v AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP (Respondent) that English courts have jurisdiction to injunct the commencement or continuation of legal proceedings brought in a foreign jurisdiction outside the Brussels Regulation/Lugano regime where no arbitral proceedings have been commenced or are proposed. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 2:04 pm
Brugmann v. [read post]
