Search for: "HH" Results 6601 - 6620 of 9,300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
After six hours of historic arguments on the health law, the Supreme Court now begins its deliberations. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 8:15 am by SarahSwank
HITECH Reporting The Interim Final Breach Notification Rule requires covered entities to inform both HHS and affected individuals when protected health information has been improperly used or accessed (a “breach”). [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:52 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
  When repeatedly asked why the Secretary of HHS does not exercise the power to withdraw all funding, his simple answer should have been, “because it would harm the beneficiaries of the program, so it’s never been done in 47 years. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm by Kate Black
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has finalized the basic requirements for exchanges. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:50 pm by jarogeti
This post is part of an ACSblog online symposium on oral argument in HHS v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:38 pm
And there's this:"[Carriers] will be legally required by [HHS Secretary Shecantbeserious] to pay the entire amount of any owed rebate directly to the subscribers of any terminated groups that cannot be located. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:37 pm by djackson
Posted by:  Anna Benyo, Senior Health Policy Analyst Months later, I am still very concerned about the decision by the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) to overrule a judgment by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to expand over-the-counter availability of the morning-after contraception Plan B One Step. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:43 am by Ted Frank
Volkswagen is now on-line, if you've already exhausted the interesting HHS v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:04 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
This post is part of an ACSblog online symposium on oral argument in HHS v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:48 pm by Jerri Lynn Ward, J.D.
DADS requires these providers to review the list of Excluded Individuals/Entities maintained by HHS (http://www.oig.hhs.gov/fraud/exclusions.asp) and HHSC (https://oig.hhsc.state.tx.us/Exclusions/Search.aspx) before hiring an applicant or contractor and at least every month for each employee or contractor. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:27 am by Suzanne Ito
We sued HHS on behalf of the members of the ACLU of Massachusetts, who object to their tax dollars being used for religious purposes. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:21 am by Heidi Henson
” Since the rate review program took effect in 2011, six months after HHS began reviewing proposed health insurance rate increases, health insurers have proposed fewer double-digit rate increases, according to a new HHS report. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:21 am by Carlos Leyva
We will also spend some time discussing Jay’s upcoming book and his view of the state of the industry as HHS prepares to release its Omnibus Rule in April 2012. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by Paul Caron
Steve Johnson (Florida State), ObamaCare Oral Argument, Day 1: I just finished reading the transcript of the Supreme Court oral argument today in HHS v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:55 pm by Sal Rotella
As required by the HITECH Act, BCBST self-reported the breach to HHS. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:52 am by Robert Percival
I just returned from this morning’s oral argument in Department of HHS v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
R (HH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, R (PH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa, BH (AP) and another v The Lord Advocate and another (Scotland), KAS or H (AP) v The Lord Advocate and another (Scotland) and Genoa  Filipek-Kwasny v Polish Judicial Authority, heard 5 – 8 March 2012. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:09 am
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and state insurance regulators started the rate review program to implement a section of [ObamneyCare©]"And, once again, here's the uproar from the States.Original content copyright © InsureBlog [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:25 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
As I noted two years ago, the statutory provisions at issue in HHS v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 7:49 pm by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) I wonder if folks at HHS were in contact with folks at Justice before they decided to announced a few weeks back that health insurers must cover contraceptives. [read post]