Search for: "High v State"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2015, 7:57 am
In the September 2015 decision of State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 7:29 am
Div case, Pappas v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:49 am
Accordingly, the state high court reversed the decision below and remanded the case to the circuit court to consider all the surrounding factors, as required by Schultz. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 3:29 am
Gelman v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
I'm glad to say that, in yesterday's Cerame v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
Bonness v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:06 am
Even the Supreme Court has held in State of MP v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am
Clancy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:50 am
Riley v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
The IP High Court of Japan said in its judgment on FRAND issues in the 2014 Apple v Samsung case (English translations of the judgments are available here) that relatively few public opinions (invited by the court, as reported earlier in IPKat) suggested that the court should apply the Antimonopoly Act. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm
Whether all reasonable steps have been taken will be fact-specific and the hurdle is a high one; the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) stated in its Statutory Code of Practice that “an employer would be considered to have taken all reasonable steps if there were no further steps that they could have been expected to take…” The scope of the defence was recently considered by the employment tribunal (ET) in Fischer v London United Busways Ltd,… [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:57 am
Note that the order in which I just stated the parties is Appellant v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
In 1991, the Second Circuit held that a high-ranking New York City employee could not be fired in retaliation for giving subpoenaed testimony before a State Assembly Committee about the validity of civil service tests for police officers. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
An expanded panel has the power to overrule prior three-judge decisions (such as those concerning the patent=eligibility of computer-implemented inventions in Research Affiliates LLC v Commissioner of Patents [2014] FCAFC 150 and Commissioner of Patents v RPL Central Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 177), and its decision will be binding on all Australian courts and tribunals (including the Patent Office), other than the High Court.The nature of the Commissioner’s… [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm
On 1 December 2023, Jay J handed down judgment in Dyson v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 8:27 am
Last fall, a panel of the Seventh Circuit handed down Exodus Refugee Immigration, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 10:33 am
Although the SCOTUS definitively ruled on the issue in the Obergefell v Hodges decision, the struggle continues.In the wake of Obergefell -cloaking marital equality with constitutional Due Process protections- a crop of state laws have been proposed collaterally challenging the High Court's ruling. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 8:39 am
California’s counties are still figuring out how to adjust to “realignment,” the name given to the state’s efforts to comply with the judicial decree, upheld in Plata v. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 7:25 am
[Germany] [Petition granted] [Rights of custody]In Vonnahme v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 10:16 am
A. v. [read post]
