Search for: "J. Eddings" Results 6601 - 6620 of 6,777
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2007, 7:35 am
See The Federalist No. 51, p. 349 (J. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 2:30 am
According to the Stanford Encyclopedia, "Jürgen Habermas currently ranks as one of the most influential philosophers in the world. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 2:54 pm
Randall Lesaffer, ed., Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One (Cambridge University Press, 2004) is reviewed on H-Law by Walter J. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:20 pm
  Kudos go out to Ike Gulas, Jason Stuckey, Ed Angwin (Ike, Jason and Ed are from the Gulas & Stuckey Law Firm), Jim Orr, and Charles Miller for all of their efforts in the Lee Hendelson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
Ike Gulas, Jason Stuckey, Ed Angwin  Jim Orr, Charles Miller, and I just finished up in the Southern District of Florida, West Palm Beach. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
Ike Gulas, Jason Stuckey, Ed Angwin  Jim Orr, Charles Miller, and I just finished up in the Southern District of Florida, West Palm Beach. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Limitation periods start when a Plaintiff has, or ought to have, discovered, a viable cause of action for any head of damage. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 8:28 am
One of his photographs reached a world record for photography when it auctioned in 2005 for over $1.2 million.The artist Jeff Koons (who recently won a case against a photographer whose image he placed in a painted collage) has similarly caused scandal, litigation, and has eventually reaped tremendous financial rewards for reinterpretations - or outright taking - of works under copyright.Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 3d Ed. 2008) by Raymond J. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 3:30 am
American Enterprise Institute's Ted Frank provides this excellent WSJ ($) op-ed on the stakes involved in the upcoming Supreme Court decision in Stoneridge v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:31 am
Ct. 1955 (U.S. 2007), a solid 7-2 majority (per Souter, J.) of the Court said some things about federal pleading that it (and we) recognized were long overdue.Basically, federal courts (and we hope state courts with rules that track the federal rules) should no longer allow pleadings to become the almost fact-free zones that pre-Twombly practice has permitted. [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:47 pm
A. (1958) 51 Cal.2d 59, 71 (conc. opn. of McComb, J.).) [read post]