Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 29,466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2013, 12:46 pm
The case of State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:19 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 6:40 am
At the trial court level in Lackawanna County, Judge James A. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 11:00 pm
. *** SRI Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:57 am
The district court in this case defined the clearly established right similarly and therefore correctly stated “the level of generality at which the relevant ‘legal rule’ is to be identified. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:40 am
They do not, therefore, rise to the level of harassment. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:30 am
Using Values to Depolarise (European Union, 2020) [text]Resource:New Series from IOM [access]- Short "think pieces, written by our High-Level Advisers, on the potential changes, impacts and implications for migration and mobility arising from COVID19. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:34 am
Harris, et al v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
The provisions of the Stipulated Final Order (full text) in People of the State of New York v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:04 am
Fourth Street, San Jose, CA 95113, in Dave Brock v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
J.A.M. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 4:46 am
The one being considered by the state supreme court is Meinken v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:01 am
But if recent history is any indication, the next steps in this area will be taken on the state level. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 7:37 am
The Court's recent decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:49 am
The decision is Case C‑441/13, Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH, a request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien (Austria).The facts are as follows. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 9:21 pm
Now in Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 1:12 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 5:35 am
Boyer of the Venango County Court of Common Pleas recently issued an April 24, 2010 Opinion and Order in the case of Heller v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:20 pm
" At the same time, however, the Court has held that depictions that do not arise to the level of obscenity "has social value" and therefore First Amendment protection. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Harris v American International Group. [read post]
