Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 29,466
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
V. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 10:09 am
As for the notion of ‘territory’, it was recalled that it may include geographical areas which, although under the jurisdiction or responsibility of a different State, have a separate and distinct status under international law (Court of Justice, Council v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 7:03 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm
More importantly, they state that it is medically desirable to do so. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 1:06 am
And those submissions present a distorted picture, for the reasons stated above.In this post I'll focus only on the proportionality of injunctions, not on other aspects of the reform bill that the submissions touch on, except where there is an inevitable overlap.Submissions in favor of major improvement over the status quo (i.e., fewer injunctions)Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition: That one is fantastic. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 12:58 pm
Waldera Seyfarth Synopsis: In Rusis, et al. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
—To carry out this section, the Secretary of Agriculture may approve State agency plans for temporary emergency standards of eligibility and levels of benefits under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) for households with eligible children. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 4:38 am
No one would expect Judge DiFiore to be particularly concerned about a defendant being held as a Level 2 sex offender based on a sentence in a report. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
., inherent or acquired distinctiveness of the sign at hand, states that:1. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 12:20 pm
Z[3] Stroud v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:52 am
" Thus, in Cohen v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am
The GC also stated that Tulliallan could rely on the protection of earlier mark’s reputation for all of the services covered by earlier marks in Class 35. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
See Reno v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:38 am
Iqbal, then known as Iqbal v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 7:12 am
The Act also codified the Supreme Court’s holding in Alexander v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:49 am
Federal Trade Comm’n v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:57 am
Shadi.com v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
In line with Lord Justice Jacob’s point in Actavis v Merck, the Court of Appeal stated that – in certain circumstances – there is nothing inventive about routinely-taken steps even if the actual outcome had not been predicted. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:26 pm
., the level of success -- don't matter in the context of state-initiated charitable trust actions. [read post]
