Search for: "Line v. Line"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 45,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2011, 5:28 am
Posted by Dave WallerBecause hospitality developers are increasingly being encouraged, and in some cases required, to comply with the LEED rating system, we have been keeping an eye on Gifford v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:07 pm
In Peter v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 10:21 pm
Narducci v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
Hacon HHJ held, in line with obiter comments of the BGH in Hydropyridin, that an EPC 2000 claim may be infringed where there is a s.9(1) infringing act in Germany, such as manufacture, including where the product is destined for export. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
The Court seemed to hold that in 1962, when it ruled in Engel v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 11:04 am
See Lexis.com "Social Media and the National Labor Relations Act: The Silver Lining in the NLRB General Counsel’s Latest Report". [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 6:30 am
“A line-by-line analysis of Mr. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 9:12 pm
Still, check out this zinger of a closing line from Posner's recent Wall Street Journal op-ed on the CFPA:"Behavioral economists are right to point to the limitations of human cognition. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 1:06 pm
Download Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:01 pm
Major Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 9:24 am
Background from Counterfeit Chic here.JA Apparel Corp. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:04 pm
Dole (1987) and NFIB v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 5:25 am
Over to Daniel:This Kat bears belated news of the most recent episode in the IPCom saga in the form of a decision from the Patents Court decision, handed down on 24 April 2015, in IPCom v HTC [IPCOM GmbH & Co Kg v HTC Europe Co Ltd & Ors [2015] EWHC 1034 (Pat) (24 April 2015)].The decision relates to the European Patent (UK) 1 841 268 belonging to IPCom; a divisional of the patent EP 1 186 189. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 2:59 am
Recently, a two judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India had the occasion in Arasmeta Captive Power Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:39 am
Although the Supreme Court won’t actually be hearing the appeal in Salford v Mullen in November, it will be hearing the appeals in the cases of Hounslow v Powell, Leeds v Hall and Birmingham v Frisby. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 9:10 pm
Your first mention in what will, with luck, be a long line of (at least mostly) positive and glowingly effusive praise. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
I nonetheless loved the last line. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Rahman v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 10:40 am
We know there's a difference between a guy with a beard and a guy without one, but we can't draw a line between that's at all objective. [read post]
