Search for: "Lively v. State" Results 6601 - 6620 of 29,023
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 1:37 pm by SJM
The State sold the land occupied by the community to a private investor in 2006 and the Courts ordered the community's expulsion on the grounds that they had no proprietary interest in the land, despite the time they had already lived there with the State's acquiescence. [read post]
14 May 2012, 1:37 pm by SJM
The State sold the land occupied by the community to a private investor in 2006 and the Courts ordered the community's expulsion on the grounds that they had no proprietary interest in the land, despite the time they had already lived there with the State's acquiescence. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:34 am by Steven M. Gursten
Kreiner required peoples’ entire lives be altered by personal injury from a car accident before they could recover compensation. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:55 pm by Mark Graber
Such pre-New Deal decisions as United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
" Despite increasing caseloads, New York state judges have not received a salary increase (not even a cost of living adjustment), in almost nine years. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 12:07 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Moreover, it is not necessary for the State to allege any injury to a patient to recover the civil penalties it seeks in its live petition. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 1:13 pm
The woman, Holly Mitchell, lived with a convicted sex offender and let her children stay with the man while she was at work.Mitchell appealed her conviction, claiming the state's law is unconstitutional because it treats people who are not married and living with a sex offender differently than people who are married and living with a sex offender.The Supreme Court on Friday rejected that argument, saying it's reasonable to believe that an unmarried… [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 8:56 pm by Barry Barnett
  So much so that Golden State courts have struck down class-action bans that show up in consumer contracts whether they apply to lawsuits, Discover Bank v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:19 pm by Steven M. Gursten
Today, I’m sharing a post from a concerned Michigan resident who posted about the state’s car accident law changing last month with the Michigan Supreme Court ruling on McCormick v. [read post]