Search for: "M v. M" Results 6601 - 6620 of 53,959
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The PIL aims to argue that the gig workers or app-based workers fall within the meaning of “unorganized workers” or “wage workers” as per Sections 2(m) and 2(n) of the Unorganized Workers Social Welfare Security Act, 2008. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Appellate Division, Third Department  Improper to discredit Respondent’s denial of paternity on the basis that  he never definitively took steps to dissuade the child or anyone else that he was NOT the father             In Matter of Montgomery County Dept of Social Services o/b/o Donavin E, v Trini G 195 A.D.3d 1069, 149 N.Y.S.3d 667 (3d Dept.,2021)  petitioner commenced a proceeding seeking… [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 8:39 am
"  As I read further, yep, I was indeed not surprised by the ultimate result.But my second thought was, honestly:  "I know I'm old, but Judge Wallace has to be really getting up there, no? [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 11:52 am by Eric Goldman
If you live in Texas, I’m sorry that your governance mechanisms are so broken. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 12:31 am by JR Chaves
Veamos, la clave de bóveda la marca lo que ha dicho el mismísimo Tribunal Constitucional: las formas están al servicio del fondo, o sea, no confundamos lo místico con lo empírico. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
I took a quick look at Greene’s amicus brief in Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:03 pm by Stewart Baker
Michael Weiner unpacks the new, amended complaint in FTC v. [read post]