Search for: "MATTER OF T F"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 13,727
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2015, 8:19 am
Blake Reid, Samuelson-Glushko Technology Law & Policy Clinic at Colorado Law: Existing exemptions for (j), (g), and (f) for research/reverse engineering, but as we detailed in comments, there are shortcomings in each. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
We don’t purport to be either scientists or regulatory lawyers, so now we’ll turn to the underlying purpose of this post, which is the legal precedent involving pharmacogenomics and product liability.Pharmacogenomic Product Liability ClaimsPharmacogenomics is a double-edged sword. [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:16 am
[T]he determination of whether hostilities have ended is a matter “of political judgement for which judges have neither technical competence nor official responsibility. [read post]
25 May 2015, 8:18 pm
I’m told schizoaffective disorder is the official diagnosis — basically a combination of schizophrenia and bipolarism — but the particular reasons for her commitment don’t really matter; she gets committed, gets medicated, convinces doctors to release her, immediately stops taking meds, and the cycle of violence and craziness repeats until she’s committed again. [read post]
25 May 2015, 8:18 pm
I’m told schizoaffective disorder is the official diagnosis — basically a combination of schizophrenia and bipolarism — but the particular reasons for her commitment don’t really matter; she gets committed, gets medicated, convinces doctors to release her, immediately stops taking meds, and the cycle of violence and craziness repeats until she’s committed again. [read post]
25 May 2015, 8:18 pm
I’m told schizoaffective disorder is the official diagnosis — basically a combination of schizophrenia and bipolarism — but the particular reasons for her commitment don’t really matter; she gets committed, gets medicated, convinces doctors to release her, immediately stops taking meds, and the cycle of violence and craziness repeats until she’s committed again. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
In his motion respondent relies on recent appellate authority, to wit Matter of Vitti, 202 A.D.2d 917, 609 N.Y.S.2d 686 (3rd Dept.1994) which holds that Family Court Act Article 8 does not authorize imposition of consecutive commitments. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:55 pm
See Yamada III, 872 F. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:59 am
See Yamada III, 872 F. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:59 am
See Yamada III, 872 F. [read post]
22 May 2015, 9:42 am
” Digitech, 758 F.3d 1344 (Fed. [read post]
22 May 2015, 8:33 am
Castro, 465 F.3d 479, 484 (11th Cir. 2006). [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:20 pm
Acting Associate Attorney General Stuart F. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:19 pm
Lichtenberger, 19 F. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:28 am
Brown, 754 F. [read post]
19 May 2015, 12:24 pm
In that circumstance, the court may still have power to act on the violation under G.S. 15A-1344(f). [read post]
19 May 2015, 8:45 am
., 128 F.3d 86, 91-92 (2d Cir. 1997)…. [read post]
19 May 2015, 8:18 am
., No. 12-57302, -- F.3d – (9th Cir. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:01 pm
We just can’t tell. [read post]
18 May 2015, 2:15 pm
MCA, Inc., 863 F.2d 1465, 1479 (9th Cir. 1988) aff’d sub nom. [read post]
