Search for: "Matter of Brown"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 9,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2024, 8:48 am
Additionally, as AI advances, more transactional work may become commoditized, potentially leading to increased adoption of AFAs for these components of legal matters. [read post]
11 May 2020, 2:13 pm
The event will feature remarks from: Seth Jones, Harold Brown Chair and Director of the Transnational Threats Project; Brian Katz, former CIA analyst for the Middle East; Shannon Culbertson, visiting fellow at CSIS; and Col. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
RIME is a well known street artist who has been resident in Brooklyn. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
However, the Court of Appeal decided that a) the matter was of wider public interest and b) given that the appellant’s current AST was shortly to end, there was a [surely slim] possibility that Enfield would find that the chain of causation hadn’t been broken and that the appellant and his wife remained intentionally homeless, as per their review decision under appeal. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:57 am
Brown, No. 10-76, slip op. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 8:18 am
§ 362(h), leaving this matter to the exclusive province of the debtor in most cases. [read post]
7 Jun 2006, 6:38 am
Brown (Sept. 26, 1991), Mahoning App. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
(PatLit) Taking control of outside legal spending (inovia) Global – Copyright USTR releases finalized ACTA (Public Knowledge) (IP Watch) (Techdirt) (Patently-O) (ipwars) (Michael Geist) (IPKat) (Knowledge Ecology International) (Spicy IP) ACTA: USTR’s talking points to WTO Council for TRIPS (Knowledge Ecology International) A KEI note to Library of Congress about ACTA text (Knowledge Ecology International) Non-responsive letter from David Kappos of USPTO to Senators Sanders and… [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 11:53 am
“In order to have a valid judgment the court must have both jurisdiction over the subject matter of the litigation and jurisdiction over the parties. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 12:19 pm
The systematic unanimity of the Supreme Court following Brown seems to have had no affect, for example, on segregationist willingness to accept even the smidgen of desegregation (one cannot possibly call it "integration") in, say, Little Rock. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
The minority (Lords Judge, Brown, Rodger and Walker) favoured limiting compensation to category one cases only. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 11:53 am
Perhaps there is something in the American culture that accepts Lucy enticing Charlie Brown and then snatching the football from him. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:53 am
But context and language matter. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:44 am
Not that it wasn't happening, but that it didn't matter. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
Brown (which I discussed in the preceding post). [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
While that technically is true, it ultimately does not matter. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:40 am
But that’s partly why this all matters, and should be gotten right. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm
Brown (1961), Newman v. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 9:57 am
Brown, 558 NE 2d 309 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1990 Some level of opinion testimony is permitted under the Illinois Rules of Evidence. [read post]
