Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 22,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times urges the court to rule for the convicted defendants in both cases. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:58 am
It is important to base comments on the Regulation to what was actually adopted, not to earlier discussion drafts containing provisions that were not adopted. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:01 pm
Four justices would have ruled that the Sixth Amendment does not require a unanimous jury at all, while four others would have ruled that the Sixth Amendment establishes a right to a unanimous jury that applies in both state and federal courts. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
Professor Mila Sohoni is the author of a string of significant articles on administrative law, and two of her forthcoming articles are about national injunctions. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:48 am
More generally, it wishes to publish its findings in order that the matter receive public scrutiny. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 9:09 am
Or it might rule that the Court’s review of Louisiana’s law is premature, because it may not be clear as a factual matter that the law would actually work, in practice, to limit doctors’ opportunity to perform abortions at the three clinics that remain in the state. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
They also have limited flexibility to make doctrine more deferential or rule-like. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 11:20 am
In other words, states were now free to require remote sellers to collect sales tax from their residents, but the details still mattered. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 10:51 am
In this case, the appeals court might even adopt a test similar to the one used in the U.S. for antisuit injunctions. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 10:31 am
The court also offered an alternative basis for its ruling. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 5:28 am
Licensed paraprofessionals would be required to comply with rules of professional conduct, meet CLE requirements, carry malpractice insurance, and use written fee agreements disclosing the limited scope of their services. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
[DOJ’s Schrödinger’s Briefs in the Emoluments Clauses litigation are in tension with a 2009 OLC Opinion] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] In a recent post, we explained that the Congressional Research Service ("CRS") has shifted its position concerning the Foreign Emoluments Clause. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
The change means the plaintiffs can now obtain their licenses, and the state will likely argue that the case is now moot (though the plaintiffs have said they plan to press ahead with their lawsuit to obtain a ruling on the constitutional issues). [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:19 am
As a result of this status, the state of Jammu and Kashmir enacted its own Constitution, which was formally adopted by a Constituent Assembly on November 17, 1956, and entered into force on January 26, 1957. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
He also recommended that the board provide a mechanism that would allow any stakeholder to petition for a change in board standards or rules. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
Ultimately, the House adopted all 13 articles of impeachment recommended by the Judiciary Committee. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
In Schein, the District Court ruled that the argument for arbitration was wholly groundless and denied a motion to compel arbitration. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
”[12] This characterization does not jibe with the many instances where FCC rulings [13] and statements by Chairman Pai [14]and others emphasized the disastrous impact on network neutrality regulation. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
”[12] This characterization does not jibe with the many instances where FCC rulings [13] and statements by Chairman Pai [14]and others emphasized the disastrous impact on network neutrality regulation. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:20 am
The trial judge adopted a “hybrid” procedure for conducting the bench trial that included holding a charge conference on the substantive law, as in a criminal jury trial, and making detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law, as in a civil bench trial. [read post]
