Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 16,715
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2019, 6:45 am
It involves three people: the victim, Ruth Williams, strangled to death in her apartment; Paul Scrimo, who was convicted of murder; and John Kane, who was present at the time of the murder. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:37 pm
Files: lenz.opening.public.pdfRelated Issues: Free SpeechIntellectual PropertyDMCARelated Cases: Lenz v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 6:13 am
Many people were involved in the attack. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:48 pm
“Disparate impact” by race means that an employment policy has a greater negative impact on people of a particular race, even if the employer did not intend the policy to be discriminatory and even if the policy does not appear obviously discriminatory on its face. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:17 am
Vidal v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:20 am
The well-known Apple v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 4:25 am
Rptr. 3d 449 (App. 2006), review granted (Cal. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 10:22 am
The trial court granted that motion. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
Graham v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm
” Private hearing and anonymity The Judge emphasised that the information in this case plainly concerns sexual activity between two people, taking place in private. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:28 pm
(Blackkango | Dreamstime.com) Today, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in City of Grants Pass v. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
As a provision for establishing standards for granting temporary relief in such circumstances, the Section is concerned about the use of the word “prohibited” (禁止) in Article 10 without limit, and the apparent overbreadth of other parts of that Article. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 2:16 pm
In eBay, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:06 am
After an accidental release-and-then-recall yesterday, today the Supreme Court officially issued Moyle v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
There is no power granted to the legislature to remove rights, for any group of people, or for all persons, by writ. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Attorney Gen. of the US, No. 07-2509 Petition for review of a BIA order finding petitioner removable for having committed an aggravated felony, contrary to an IJ's finding and grant of cancellation of removal, is granted where the BIA erred in failing to apply the modified categorical approach set forth in applicable Supreme Court precedent, and thus it erred when it considered petitioner's sentencing document to determine whether he had been convicted of an aggravated… [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:04 am
Bivins v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:53 pm
Courtney v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
The first is Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
At the time of Mrs H's death, only one of the people who comprised 'the tenant' had died. [read post]
