Search for: "Robert v. State"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 19,134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2018, 6:55 am
Summarily terminating a federal officer holding a term appointment from his or her positionPHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, USCA District of Columbia Circuit, Docket #15-1177NYPPL earlier summarized the decision in PHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a decision in which the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit [Docket #15-1177] considered the issue of summarily removing a public officer… [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
The first was United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Roberts v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:43 pm
Today, the Court emphatically disagreed, ruling in the case Jennings v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:41 pm
From Rhode Island state legislator Robert Nardolillo III several days ago: Representative Robert Nardolillo III (R-Dist. 28, Coventry) will introduce legislation to increase mental health and counseling resources in schools by implementing a tax on video games rated "M" or higher. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 2:12 pm
United States, or credit terms in Catalano Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:38 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare In preparation for Tuesday’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:35 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument Tuesday morning in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 8:44 am
ROBERTS, C. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:08 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Janus v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 2:36 pm
” It turns out the story by the Post’s Supreme Court correspondent, Robert Barnes, is a site-visit preview of one of Tuesday’s cases, Lozman v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:32 pm
If anything, the recent Supreme Court judgment on indirect discrimination by a provision, criterion or practice (PCP) in Essop and others (Appellants) v Home Office (UK Border Agency) (Respondent) Naeem (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) (2017) UKSC 27 might have made such a claim more straightforward to bring. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:23 pm
How, Roberts asked, does the negotiation of wages not affect the state budget? [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:34 am
Excerpt:At Reuters, Robert Iafolla and Lawrence Hurley report that “[t]aking away mandatory agency fees could have profound implications for public-sector union coffers. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 5:57 am
Robert Chesney dissected a factual dispute in Doe v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 11:16 am
Josh Blackman examined the flaws in the Article II analysis of Judge Roger Gregory concurring opinion in IRAP v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 7:56 am
United States v. [read post]
