Search for: "State v. Save"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 11,764
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2012, 7:58 am
Our firm is pleased to offer you a savings of 50% off the outstanding balance owed on this account. [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:30 am
The new tier would save approximately $7 billion cumulatively over the course of the first 20 years after implementation. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
This representation reminded me of a similar colloquy from NFIB v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:40 am
(Ilya Somin) A little over a year has passed since the Supreme Court’s momentous decision in NFIB v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
See Roper v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am
Grand jury subpoenas, unlike trial subpoenas, may be served nationwide: there are geographical limitations within the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 1:54 pm
Certainly using the motion to dismiss route saved that company a lot of money. [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:53 am
The Supreme Court, in the 5-3 decision in McCoy v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
This followed the line of authority excluding national law defences as illustrated by Case C-661/11 Martin y Paz Diffusion SA v Depuydt [2014] Bus LR 329 which stated that "...Consequently, save for the specific cases governed by article 8 et seq of that Directive, a national court may not, in a dispute relating to the exercise of the exclusive right conferred by a trade mark, limit that exclusive right in a manner which exceeds the limitations arising from… [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm
Whether the object is to save drafting time or to ensure absolute consistency, or laziness, one of these contracts may state that the terms of another document or contract are incorporated into it. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 2:56 am
In that regard reliance may be placed on a Full Bench judgment of this Court rendered in the case of State of Punjab v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:49 pm
Whether it marks progress from Farmer v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:21 am
Note: In California, the ACLU has launched a campaign to get elected officials to enact sentencing reform as they strive to resolve the state's budget crisis and implement the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
In particulra, all the cases cited by the (all male) bench involve instances in which a male boss dismisses a female employee in order to « save his marriage ». [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 11:23 am
In his dissent to today's Supreme Court Second Amendment ruling in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:26 am
First up is State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 11:00 am
Ran Hirschl ha influentially criticized the tendency to focus on what he calls the “usual suspects,” i.e., the documentary constitutions and attendant decisions of the apex courts of no more than a dozen countries, almost all of them “Western” save for Japan and India, but not including, say, Ukraine, Bengaladesh, Zimbabwe, Saudi Arabia, or any of the other 191 countries within the United Nations (almost all, save for Great Britain, New Zealand, and… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:35 am
As a result, a decision in favor of California could set aprecedent that will allow states to effectively disregard federal law in orderto achieve state budgetary savings. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:14 am
(See Navarro Savings Ass’n v Lee, 446 U.S. 458, 461 [1980] [“a federal court must disregard nominal or formal parties and rest jurisdiction only upon the citizenship of real parties to the controversy”]). [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
Therefore, if we look only to the ACA itself, and the HHS regulations under it, large employers would, in fact, save money by dropping their health-insurance plans. [read post]
