Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 21,970
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2018, 6:59 am
., Plaintiff Julia Mark, an employee of FedEx Office, injured her neck, back, ankle, and left knee when she fell on a sidewalk. [read post]
11 May 2018, 5:11 am
Hugo Zacchini, the circus-performer plaintiff, objected when his human cannonball act was broadcast on the nightly news. [read post]
11 May 2018, 5:00 am
The Order further prohibited the Plaintiff from recording the standardized testing portion of the evaluation. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:00 am
But the application of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1)’s proportionality test to issues such as these is not clear. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
The magistrate judge applied a federal-law balancing test, rather than state law, and denied the protective-order request. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
The magistrate judge applied a federal-law balancing test, rather than state law, and denied the protective-order request. [read post]
9 May 2018, 1:02 pm
A jury assessed the Plaintiff’s claim at $30,200 but then cut this down to $4,530 on the basis that they found the Plaintiff 85% at fault for the crash. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:43 am
To win in a malpractice claim, the plaintiff must prove the following four elements: i) the physician owed the patient a duty of care; ii) the physician breached the duty of care; iii) the physician’s breach was a direct cause of the injuries; and iv) the plaintiff(s) suffered quantifiable damages as a result. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:43 am
To win in a malpractice claim, the plaintiff must prove the following four elements: i) the physician owed the patient a duty of care; ii) the physician breached the duty of care; iii) the physician’s breach was a direct cause of the injuries; and iv) the plaintiff(s) suffered quantifiable damages as a result. [read post]
9 May 2018, 8:00 am
The plaintiff, who worked in a store in California, challenged that classification primarily based on the argument that the exempt functions of the position did not make up more than 50 percent of the time worked and thus failed California’s quantitative exemption tests. [read post]
8 May 2018, 8:48 am
Throughout the McDonnell-Douglas test, the plaintiff bears the ultimate burden to establish that the employer engaged in intentional discrimination. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:04 am
Defendants’ editorial reviews principally rely on “publicly available information,” rather than defendants’ own use or testing. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm
In January 2005, Plaintiff Charles Lee entered into a written independent contractor agreement with Dynamex to provide delivery services for the company. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm
In January 2005, Plaintiff Charles Lee entered into a written independent contractor agreement with Dynamex to provide delivery services for the company. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:37 pm
We hold it is not appropriate to use that test when considering the remedy for invidious discrimination in jury selection, which should be free of any bias. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:11 pm
In today's Petro-Lubricant Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 2:24 pm
He struggled taking tests and sought help from the program coordinator. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:57 pm
Part of the process, for example, involves field sobriety tests that are not part of the standard battery of tests approved by the NHTSA. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:57 pm
Part of the process, for example, involves field sobriety tests that are not part of the standard battery of tests approved by the NHTSA. [read post]
7 May 2018, 11:29 am
Further, the fact that staffers used this hold to control the patient means they were not ascertaining her medical condition through examination, testing, prescribing and administering care to effect a cure or meet her daily needs. [read post]
