Search for: "U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS" Results 6601 - 6620 of 7,050
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2009, 2:54 am
The Chicago office of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") had filed a civil lawsuit against dentist James L. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:15 am
Kent Conrad and Max Baucus (PDF 52.6 KB) Letter Urges Improvements to Disaster Aid Program 01/13/2009 Letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid From Attorney General Michael Mukasey (PDF 64 KB) Provides a Memorandum Titled, "Constitutionality of the OLC Reporting Act of 2008" (S. 3501), Dated Nov. 14, 2008 01/13/2009 Report: An Investigation of Allegations of Politicized Hiring and Other Improper Personnel Actions in the Civil Rights Division… [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:51 pm
American Civil Liberties Union, et al. , 08-565). ** The Court denied review of a case seeking to test the constitutional right to privacy,when government officials release personal information about an individual, resulting in identity theft. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 9:13 am
The commission, chaired by former U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 7:32 am
From her bio: Named by President Jimmy Carter as the first woman to chair the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, she came to Congress as a national figure who had been a civil rights and feminist leader, tenured law professor of law, and board member of three Fortune 500 companies. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 5:29 am
District Court in Albany last May after first filing a complaint under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:36 am
On April 4, 2006, Sallis filed a Charge of Discrimination with the Illinois Department of Human Rights and the U.S. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:40 am
Angels' Mother's Day tote bag promotion for mothers only did not violate the state's Unruh Civil Right Act. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Poole, No. 08-2328 Denial of defendant's motion to modify her sentence is affirmed where the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to revisit defendant's sentence because it was based on a statutory minimum sentence, not a range the Sentencing Commission has subsequently lowered. [read post]