Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 7,103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
Dudas, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office (07-1504), the U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:34 am
This article suggests that an applicant's right to file an unlimited number of continuing applications is "[o]ne of the oddest things about the United States patent system. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Porsche AG: (Class 46), WIPO: Yell Limited v Yell.travel: domain name yell.travel to be transferred to Yell Limited: (Class 46), Some see rise in non-traditional trade marks; national registries not yet: (Intellectual Property Watch) Global - Patents Lower patentability standards – strategic responses: (IP Thinktank), IP Business Congress sees Finnish inventor become a millionaire: (IAM), Ron Slusky: Five prescriptions for effectively analysing an invention and… [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:34 pm
Known as the “Dog Ate My Homework Act”, Section 4 of the bill involves a grant of authority to the Director or the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to excuse specific late filingsâ€â [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 2:35 pm
In the interest of full disclosure, the Federal Register also notes that "an applicant filing an international application under the PCT in the United States Receiving Office (the United States Patent and Trademark Office) is not required to use the United States Patent and Trademark Office as the International Searching Authority," as "[t]he European Patent Office (except for… [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 9:39 pm
Rev. 1735 (2007) titled RETHINKING PATENT LAW'S UNIFORMITY PRINCIPLE: A RESPONSE TO NARD AND DUFFY.Another judge-written article of interest is Judge Dyk's article A REVIEW OF RECENT DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT: FOREWORD: DOES THE SUPREME COURT STILL MATTER? [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Associated Press – AP files seven DMCA takedowns against Drudge Retort blog over users linking to its stories: (The Trademark Blog), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (IPKat), (The Trademark Blog), ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and… [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
, Schering-Plough Corp – Following dispute over trade dress with Schering-Plough, Fruit of the Earth announces plan to change its package design: (IP Law360), US: Quanta and its impact on biotechnology: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), US: BIO files amicus brief asking CAFC to cabin in scope of KSR and hold that its obvious to try dicta does not abrogate the Deuel standard: In re Kubin: (Patently-O), US: StemCells gets patent on enriched central nervous system stem… [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
Per a USPTO press release earlier this week: The Department of Commerce's United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will publish tomorrow in the Federal Register new rules that will improve the process of ex parte appeals before the USPTO's Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI). [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 12:35 pm
Washington Conference Center, and will include sessions on copyrights (by Ben Hardman, Attorney Advisor, Office of Intellectual Property Policy and Enforcement (OIPPE), USPTO), patents (by Marina Lamm, Attorney Advisor, OIPPE), trademarks, and intellectual property enforcement. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 4:15 am
Obtaining nationwide trademark protection is possible by registering your trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:39 pm
Patent and Trademark Office] coupled with violations of § 2"). [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 8:33 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit looked at the issue of whether Aventis committed that most horrible of patent sins — inequitable conduct before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
: (Spicy IP) Events 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 11 June: US PLI ‘Advanced patent licensing 2008: What you need to know before licensing your patent’ – San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 11 June: MARQUES ‘First meeting with Spanish Judges of the Community Trade Mark Courts’ – Alicante: (Class 46), 13-14 June: Centre for European Economic Research… [read post]
30 May 2008, 10:11 am
United States Patent & Trademark Office: Patents and trademarks can be researched for free at "[www.uspto.gov]". [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
27 May 2008, 7:21 am
MI & FL are excluded. ....The United States has a total of 538 electoral votes and 270 are needed to win the Presidency. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
: (Patent Baristas), Canada: Generic drug manufacturers urge Parliament to forfeit idea of new regulations delaying their ability to reproduce drugs: (Spicy IP), India: Indian generics and health activists having problem over patent titles: (Patent Circle), Europe: EPO to determine in June the fate of WARF stem cell patent application: (IPBiz), India: Choking the patients??? [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:45 am
According to the website, USPTO Examiners (www.usptoexaminers.com) “is a website designed for professionals to anonymously review, rank, and learn about a patent examiner or a trademark examining attorney who works at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
20 May 2008, 4:21 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's current fraud jurisprudence holds an applicant or registrant strictly responsible for false statements made to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) regarding use of its mark on the goods and services involved, with very little room for error or innocence. [read post]
