Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant" Results 6601 - 6620 of 9,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2012, 7:52 am by Richard Santalesa
  In its opinion VOOM HD Holdings LLC, v EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., in which the defendant had  appealed from the trial court's grant of plaintiff's motion to impose sanctions for the spoilation of evidence, the First Department of the Appellate Division (in between NY's state trial level courts, unintuitively called Supreme Courts, and NY's highest court, the Court of Appeals), held... [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 4:47 am by Russ Bensing
  See my discussion of last year’s Ohio Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by INFORRM
It mainly presupposes the individual’s right to control the use of that image, including the right to refuse publication. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:30 am by Scott J. Kreppein, Esq.
While most day-to-day court orders are not published beyond the county clerk's file in the particular case (public record for most cases, and sealed for matrimonial and some others), decisions from the appellate courts, as well as select trial level decisions, are published and used as guidance for deciding future cases. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:08 am by INFORRM
On 7 February 2012 the Grand Chamber of the Court of Human Rights found that the Article 10 rights of the publisher of the German tabloid, “Bild” had been violated by injunctions granted by the German courts (Axel Springer v Germany, App No 39954/08). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 10:12 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Right now it seems the Pennsylvania legislature is focused on doing exactly the opposite by shielding nursing home companies from the same laws that apply to the rest of us (except doctors and hospitals, who received this same special protection under the MCARE Act in 2003). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:13 am by Darren O'Donovan
Damages can be granted by the Strasbourg court, but fall below the level of damages available in domestic cases. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 10:00 pm by Thomas Kaufman
  The expert plaintiff used was Richard Drogin, the same expert the plaintiffs used in Bell v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:36 pm by WIMS
" On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court granted summary judgment to the Forest Service. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
  USPTO App 85526099 for BLUE IVY CARTER There is always a level of planning required when taking care of kittens. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 4:04 am by Robert A. Epstein
  Now from the Appellate Division comes the unpublished (not precedential) matter of Villone v. [read post]