Search for: "Waits v. State"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 10,699
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Civil Rights Law section 65 was amended to provide that any person may elect to resume the use of a former middle name upon divorce or annulment and that the state shall not impose a fee to change the middle name on a state identifying document due to a change in marital status. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:30 pm
A complacency that has not only continued since the Supreme Court of Canada has condemned it in the seminal case of R. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:30 pm
A complacency that has not only continued since the Supreme Court of Canada has condemned it in the seminal case of R. v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 9:11 am
The District Court’s decision amounts to a holding that a business selling goods on the internet can be sued in any state where it has a customer, which is to say, any state at all. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
Fortunately for the State, the Supreme Court in 2011 decided Cavazos v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:59 am
Additional Resources: Mitchell v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:39 pm
United States, according to Bloomberg News. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 3:07 am
Justice Alito with opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
No, wait, the other thing — stasis. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 3:24 am
Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:37 am
” Donovan v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
In its November 23, 2016 decision in Gardella v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:00 pm
., the Utah Court of Appeals held in 14th Street Gym, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 7:04 pm
Source: Janousek v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
That’s the question posed by The City of Chicago v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Friday, October 12, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Director nominations, Proxy contests, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting, Universal proxy ballots SEC Sanctions Investment Firm for Inadequate Cybersecurity and Identity Theft Prevention Policies Posted by Sabastian V. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 8:19 am
Supreme Court in June 1992 established the “Daubert Rule” in its landmark decision Daubert v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 12:09 pm
Wait a minute. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 8:37 am
In Parvin v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 2:07 am
Star Scientific, Inc. v. [read post]
