Search for: "Wells v. State"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 66,624
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2010, 1:35 pm
United States, United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
"Kennedy v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 11:46 am
Section 3553 (a)(6) should be construed as covering disparities in state-federal as well as federal-federal comparative sentencing. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 5:20 am
And last week, in Connick v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 6:26 am
” Well I know precisely how they can do it. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 2:04 pm
In particular, a recent case – Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:10 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:45 am
Maryland, and NLRB v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
* See Alicea v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
* See Alicea v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Abrams v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:28 am
With respect to the persistence of content, the court says that this is consistent with the new terms, but not inconsistent with the old terms as well. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
S170577: I attended the oral argument today at the California Supreme Court for Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 5:27 pm
Paraphrasing the Supreme Court’s decision in Riley v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:10 am
United States, in which the Court interpreted the scope of the federal witness tampering statute can be applied, while James Bickford summarized the Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:44 am
Cortezano v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 1:56 pm
In Shockley v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
Stat. 766.118 lacks any rational relation to a state objective, and fails both the “smell test” (another quote from Justice Pariente in Estate of McCall) as well as the rational basis test. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:13 am
Bras for the Cause Iowa, Inc. v. [read post]
