Search for: "White v. State" Results 6601 - 6620 of 12,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2015, 7:41 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Reversing them has become a significant part of the Supreme Court's workload.In today's decision in White v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:57 am
A study at the time "showed that the race of his white victim made his Georgia trial court 22 times more likely to impose a death sentence. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:02 am by Peggy McGuinness
by Peggy McGuinness Almost three years have passed since the Supreme Court's decision in Medellin v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Stepanicich
Second, the states relied on Nixon v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:03 pm
He has voted in favor of gay rights, and carefully tended the line between church and state. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:30 am by jonathanturley
Past tort cases generally have favored celebrities and resulted in rulings like White v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 4:49 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Expelling two of the three students, a college committee found that all three students had in fact cheated, basing its conclusion on some questionable statistical evidence that a state court later rejected as unreliable and arbitrary. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:22 pm
The occasion, Stevens' discussion with Cliff Sloan and David McKean, the authors of The Greatest Decision (2009), an excellent social history of Chief Justice John Marshall's landmark decision on judicial review, Marbury v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
” It was long assumed that the right to jury trial meant the right to a jury of 12 persons (originally, white men). [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:09 am by John Elwood
Texas, involving allegations that a racially biased juror, who commented during voir dire that “non-white” races were statistically more violent than whites, served on petitioner Kristopher Love’s capital sentencing jury. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am by Jack Sharman
The second most important protection for a grand jury witness is the Fifth Amendment.[6]  Unfortunately, business people, public officials, professionals and other white-collar types are loath to rely on the Fifth Amendment, concluding – with justification – that most people believe that one who invokes his or her Fifth Amendment rights is guilty of something. [read post]