Search for: "Wills v. State"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 11,262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2013, 7:22 am
Feb. 4, 2013), and McDaniel v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:58 am
Today the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which it held that #freesherlock is the answer to the fascinating copyright saga that has kept Sherlock Holmes and Dr Watson's fans in an almost unbearable state of suspense for some time.Writing on behalf of the Court, Circuit Judge Richard Posner [who - this Kat is told - is known as a huge cat lover] nicely summarised what this… [read post]
30 May 2016, 10:00 am
| Google Books legal saga ends | s52 CPDA repeal comes into force 28 July 2016 | The latest Jack Wills v House of Fraser judgment [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:45 am
In a widely read Atlantic piece, James Fallows just accused the five Justices--Kennedy, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, and Alito--of being part of a judicial "coup" running back to Bush v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 6:53 am
In Ohio v. [read post]
1 Jun 2025, 7:26 am
She now reports on the upcoming consultations in more detail as follows: As mentioned, the Chair-Rapporteur of the OEIGWG for the Legally Binding Instrument (LBI), has confirmed the following second thematic consultation.Tuesday 3 and Wednesday 4 June, Room V, Palais des Nations: second consultation (arts. 6 and 8) Thursday 5 June, Room V, Palais des Nations: third consultation (arts. 9 and 11, if time permits, art. 10). . . [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am
The roadmap expressly states it is not a guide to future compliance, but rather an information document setting out Ofcom’s present thinking. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
By 2008 U.S. courts deemed the area to be under de facto sovereignty of the United States (Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 5:10 am
Another take home is that the UPC is willing to order security for damages in an appropriate inter partes case, where the rules require that the court may order security, as opposed to must in ex parte cases. [read post]
13 May 2012, 6:57 pm
Thomas (1990) 40 E.T.R. 107 (B.C.C.A.) and Smith v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am
Meanwhile, others abuse the system to receive free money[v] that is administered by one of the most wasteful and ineffective bodies—the American government—which charges a massive administration fee. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
In the August 23, 2023 opinion in Moore v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 12:40 pm
Patients lay everything bare for us to understand their situation, and they’re just happy that someone cares and is willing to help. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am
New York has successfully been doing this for almost 200 years for verdicts that are unreasonable, since Chief Judge James Kent wrote the following in Coleman v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
United StatesDocket: 10-1220Issue(s): Whether a “willful” violation of the complex regulatory provisions of the Arms Export Control Act, 22 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 8:37 am
Lollie v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:08 am
See Fox v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:56 am
In Taylore v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:10 am
” Zedella v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm
, which charged a conspiracy to smuggle Southeast Asian artifacts, including from Thailand and Cambodia, into the United States, beginning in 2004;United States v. [read post]
