Search for: "mark" Results 6601 - 6620 of 135,994
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2017, 3:56 am
" Applicant argued that the marks have different meanings, since the "IT" in the cited mark refers to information technology, and that its own services actually will focus on tools and lawn/garden equipment. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:00 am
 Your trademark and service mark attorney will review your company name and assist you with the process of registering your mark. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 3:35 am by John L. Welch
It found the "crenellated design element" to be a "significant portion of the mark which presents a bold impression not present in the standard character mark." [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 3:39 am
Applicant Product Innovations Research LLC sought to register the mark HAUTE MESS for various hair care products, but the PTO refused registration, finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark HOT MESS for various sun tan products. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:13 am
" in Opposer's marks are merely descriptive for its services, and they "they do not significantly distinguish Opposer’s marks from Applicant’s more inclusive mark THE WORLDS PAGEANTS. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:58 am
It is not required that the works in a series all be in the same format, or that the marks be used without any variation.Although applicant offers only one book under the title NO EXCUSES DIET, that is not its only use of the mark (or closely related marks). [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 5:30 pm
  However, a recent court decision by the German Federal Patent Court (case reference: 29 W (pat) 14/12) hinged on exactly that point and may provide IPKat-reading trade mark practitioners with some interesting arguments.An opposition based on an earlier Community trade mark registration for the mark CORDIUS covering, inter alia, 'financial services' was brought  against a German national trade mark application for the mark CORDIA covering… [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 2:31 pm by JCavicchi
The Supreme Court rejected Tam's argument that the disparagement clause did not reach marks that disparaged racial or ethnic groups, but only marks that disparaged "persons. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:18 am by John L. Welch
The Board reversed a Section 2(e)(2) refusal to register the mark KAPALUA for retail an online store services, finding that the primary significance of the mark is to identify the source of Applicant’s services rather than the geographic location of its resort development. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 3:42 am by John L. Welch
In this Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark REAL CHOICE, opposer claimed a likelihood of confusion with its registered mark CLEARCHOICE DENTAL IMPLANTS, both for dental implant services [DENTAL IMPLANTS disclaimed in the registered mark]. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:27 am
The Board concluded that the marks at issue engender the same commercial impression.As to the cited design mark, the words BULL CREEK are dominant. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:17 am
" Applicant contended that its mark, when considered its entirety, is readily distinguishable from the cited mark. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 3:22 am by John L. Welch
As to the marks, since the goods are in-part identical, a lesser degree of similarity between the marks is necessary to support a finding of likely confusion. [read post]
5 Dec 2005, 5:00 am
"Onfolio pointed out, inter alia, that the only common element in the marks is the suffix "IO," which is an ordinary suffix found in numerous registered marks for hardware and software. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:32 am by John L. Welch
The question was whether the marks and identified services are sufficiently similar that the distinctiveness of the registered mark may extend to the mark and services in the application. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:48 pm by cen
Der Bundesgerichtshof hat eine Verletzung der eingetragenen Marke der Klägerin bejaht. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:06 am by Jonathan H. Adler
My interest in this litigation arises from this implications for robust debate on matters of public concern, as I explained in this post.The post Climate Scientist Michael Mann Wins Defamation Suit Against Mark Steyn and Rand Simberg appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]