Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6621 - 6640
of 9,861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2017, 6:47 am
This decision comes after the English Courts had similarly refused the registration of the same Shape Marks in the United Kingdom. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 1:01 am
And some of what Huawei says is really interesting (this post continues below the document): 18-09-28 PanOptis v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 9:53 am
Crucially, the district court established that all or at least most of the reviews shared the following characteristics (par. 4.3): (i) the reviews were written in the English language; (ii) they were written by Google-users which, in total, have placed only one or two reviews; (iii) none of the names are familiar to the tailor and the identity of these users cannot be traced through the internet; (iv) the reviews refer to the Google Reviews tool and other reviews remarkably often;… [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:38 pm
We wrote a brief together in Elane Photography v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 8:34 pm
. ----------------- 1 See UN Human Rights Committee, General Comment no. 34 on freedoms of opinion and expression (Article 19 ICCPR), available at: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/docs/gc34.pdf. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 7:53 am
Broomfield Senior Living Owner, LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:00 am
The present decision may be in fact contrasted to that of the High Court of England and Wales in Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus v Babel Sajft KFT [2020] EWHC 2858. [read post]
5 May 2025, 6:11 am
See Taggart v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:50 am
FMC Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
Simon Stern The government’s motion to dismiss in CREW v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:15 am
The case is Sicre de Fontbrune v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
As another indicator of the progression of the New gTLD Program, 12 additional registry agreements have just been signed, 11 of which are the first English character TLDs. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
As the court noted recently in Riley v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:24 am
At 125 euro for 790 pages of multilingual (English, French and Spanish) scholarship this book is almost certainly a bargain -- and the contributors contain many of this Kat's favourite writers on their specialist topics within the overall field of copyright. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
. - In the matter of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
One such instance is Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others [2014] EWHC 3867 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Mr Justice Nugee of 21 November.Readers may remember that this trade mark spat has already featured several times on this blog. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
In Alexander v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 7:51 am
” Langfan v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:13 am
The most notable cases from national courts are Subafilms, Ltd. v MGM-Pathe Communications Co., 24 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 1994) (United States) and Abkco Music & Records Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
. - In the matter of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
