Search for: "Judges"
Results 6621 - 6640
of 398,608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 2:39 pm
The PiS government had brought in a number of reforms, including restructuring of the courts, ending the mandate of sitting judges prematurely and favouring appointees that were friendly to the ruling party. [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:21 pm
“Conservative Judges Won’t Hire Columbia Law Clerks Over Protests; Judges label university ‘incubator of bigotry’; Students call to divest from pro-Israel companies”: Jacqueline Thomsen of Bloomberg Law has this report. [read post]
6 May 2024, 1:47 pm
The post Federal Judges Say They Won’t Hire From Columbia, Leveraging Their Public Offices To Bully An Institution They Don’t Like appeared first on Above the Law. [read post]
6 May 2024, 1:03 pm
As one federal judge cautioned when faced with a similar case involving musician John Waite, “people cannot use a corporate structure for some purposes—e.g. taking advantage of tax benefits—and then disavow it for others. [read post]
6 May 2024, 1:00 pm
Associate Judge Maryland Judiciary, Circuit Court for Baltimore City What is your most significant accomplishment? [read post]
6 May 2024, 12:48 pm
The judge went on to call the lawyers' behavior leading up to January 6 'indefensible and inexcusable.' The post Conservative Former Judge Blames Lawyers For January 6 Insurrection appeared first on Above the Law. [read post]
6 May 2024, 12:25 pm
The pro-life side cherry picked a federal district judge, who was a former anti-abortion movement lawyer, to hear the case. [read post]
6 May 2024, 12:18 pm
NEW: 13 federal judges say they will no longer hire clerks from Columbia Law School OR Columbia College after the university allowed an encampment on its lawn to spiral into a destructive occupation of a campus building.This is the first clerkship boycott to hit undergrads.🧵 pic.twitter.com/Ex3GlqBUtK— Aaron Sibarium (@aaronsibarium) May 6, 2024 [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
The “469” Category: Section 515(11) adds a special category of offences that presumes detention until that person applies for bail before a Superior Court judge. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
The “469” Category: Section 515(11) adds a special category of offences that presumes detention until that person applies for bail before a Superior Court judge. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:15 am
And we continue to await Circuit Judge and Higher Court appeal decisions on all of this. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:56 am
Other than Judge Solomson, I do not see any Jewish judges who have joined this letter. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:42 am
Nothing in the constitution authorizes judges to void laws that violate some judges' sense of what ought to be. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:41 am
Dismissal The provisions in relation to dismissal are unclear: The judge must dismiss a claim found to constitute an abusive lawsuit against public participation, (clause 2(1)) unless The claimant satisfies the judge that the claim is like to “prevail at trial” and that the harm suffered means that the public interest in proceeding to trial outweighs the public interest in dismissing it (clause 2(2)); but The judge may dismiss the proceedings if the claim… [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:34 am
“The Supreme Court: The most powerful, least busy people in Washington; The justices are quietly quitting their day jobs as judges, even as they become more and more political. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:05 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Judge Contreras) denied a motion for pretrial release of a defendant who had recently pled guilty. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:00 am
Judges will often hear the request ex parte, meaning they only hear one side of the story (not yours) before making a decision. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:58 am
SpaceX asked the district court to stay or enjoin the NLRB’s administrative complaint and to declare that (1) the NLRB’s structure is unconstitutional because it not only limits the removal of Administrative Law Judges (“ALJ”) and Board Members, but it also permits Board Members to exercise executive, legislative, and judicial power in the same administrative proceeding; and (2) the Board’s new expanded remedies violate the employer’s constitutional right… [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:50 am
The Circuit Judge held Section 7 did apply. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:43 am
by Dennis Crouch This may be a useful case for patent prosecutors to cite to the USPTO because it creates a strong dividing line for the printed matter doctrine — applying the doctrine only to cases where the claims recite the communicative content of information. [read post]
