Search for: "Laws v. State" Results 6621 - 6640 of 155,667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2009, 5:45 am
Over at Opinio Juris, everyone's favorite international law blog, Roger Alford (pictured) has a post about United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:05 pm by Venkat
Carrier IQ moved to dismiss on the basis that the state law claims were preempted by ECPA. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The State Court of Appeals sustains some of these convictions, but it does something that courts have threatened to do for years: it strikes down the Aggravated Harassment law as unconstutitional.The case is People v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 9:14 am by John P. Feldman and Toam Rubinstein
On May 14, 2018 the Supreme Court of the United States released its decision in Murphy v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 9:14 am by John P. Feldman and Toam Rubinstein
On May 14, 2018 the Supreme Court of the United States released its decision in Murphy v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:17 pm
Maryland law requires that taxpayers file a report of federal adjustment with the State upon such an IRS determination. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:00 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in the "facebook threats" case, Elonis v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 8:04 am by Daily Record Staff
Reed attempted to postpone her hearing before an administrative law judge. [read post]
6 May 2016, 6:32 am by Daily Record Staff
Administrative law — Accidental disability benefits — Expert testimony We are asked to determine whether the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”), in determining whether appellant William Foard was entitled to accidental disability benefits: (1) improperly concluded that Foard was required to present expert testimony; and (2) applied the correct legal standard for causation. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:08 pm by Gordon Smith
Donna Nagy of the Indiana University's Maurer School of Law has been commenting on the Glom from time to time Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 7:44 am
Still, because the incident occurred in Mississippi, state law there governs whether the plaintiff has a valid case. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am by Elizabeth Prochaska, Matrix Chambers.
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am by Elizabeth Prochaska, Matrix Chambers.
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:37 pm by Daniel G.C. Glover
Introduction In a case with several important echoes to Canadian appellate law, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has revived the actor’s Hayden Christensen’s “idea theft” lawsuit against the USA Network this week in the Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]