Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 6621 - 6640
of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
Marcel Kahan & Edward B. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:50 am
We have no experience advising potential defendants in these matters. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:45 am
This is an appeal by OHIM against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (CFI) in Case T-260/031. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 10:41 am
Don't they have some ethics counsel vetting these nominations? [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 7:43 am
I can't see this going down well with small businesses, or even small families. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am
The plaintiff alleged that “[t]he bank requires an appraisal for the purposes of negotiations” and that the defendant’s failure to cooperate with an appraisal interferes with his ability to negotiate with the bank, which is necessary to comply with the terms of the parties’ stipulation. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 12:50 pm
As I noted in yesterday's UW Chancellor post, the First Amendment generally doesn't prevent government employers from firing employees for making porn videos off-duty: Porn is generally viewed as speech that's not on "matters of public concern" for purposes of First Amendment employment law. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:07 pm
No matter what situation you find yourself in, these tips can help improve your chances of successfully beating a DUI. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 12:36 am
I can’t say I’m shocked. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 7:45 am
Our lawyers are expert in managing legal matters. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 6:33 am
” This meaning works no matter whether the agency action is an adjudication or a rule. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:18 am
§12182(b)(2)(A)(iii). [read post]
24 May 2019, 5:10 pm
Conduct 4-8.4(b). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:27 pm
Judge Terence T. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
For every blockbuster court decision there must be hundreds that don't merit a headline. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:02 pm
Bad week in the office and the weekly won’t run this week (my apologies). [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 10:05 am
I don't want to give them any of that socialism, you know what I mean? [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
If the jurisdictional rules the twentieth-century Court came up with were uniquely sensible as a matter of policy, maybe their shaky origins wouldn't matter so much. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:34 am
§ 2244(d)(1)(B ) -(D). [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:51 pm
B. [read post]
