Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 6621 - 6640
of 7,022
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
The internet is for Congress to regulate [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Part I - IP finance), (Part II – IP finance),Candidates for WIPO Director General: (Innovationpartners), Cross retaliation at the WTO: Why I think WIPO is wrong: (Spicy IP),Officials outline international organisations’ IP enforcement policies: (Intellectual Property Watch),Don’t trust IP to the Post Office! [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
I. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 2:02 pm
This issue marks a major milestone, as it is volume 100, number 1. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 11:34 pm
They then lobbied Congress to pass the federal Adam Walsh Act. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 7:10 pm
They then lobbied Congress to pass the federal Adam Walsh Act. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
As I noted in a previous post, I have been having an exchange with Professor Michael Klarman over at the American Constitutional Society. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 10:33 pm
Essentially I have scaled down my law school outline and broken it into digestible portions. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 8:03 am
I think there needs to be an understanding of how we got where we are, whether that is through regulatory action, or through Congress. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 6:45 am
" See Mark J. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 6:30 pm
It also makes the superdelegates in Congress -- whether you think rightly or wrongly -- more easily subject to lobbying from the public. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 10:42 am
While Hillary and Obama are pretty similar on immigration, as they are on most issues, I give the higher mark to Hillary for her consistent emphasis on family reunification, which is one of the most important factors in my view. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP finance),Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsICANN supports Google’s fight against domain-tasting: (Class 46),Global - PatentsSoftware patents and startup innovators: (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property),Co-inventor: yes or no? [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 10:48 pm
I bring up the NYC police case because the Department of Justice (and hence Congress) actually has an historic role investigating police corruption. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 2:59 pm
I'm going to move this thing along. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 6:54 am
Today, February 12, 2008, marks the 199th anniversary of Lincoln's birth. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
I. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 2:12 pm
Via the open Law@Stanford Newsletter of February, 2008, we were alerted to Two Views of Innovation, Colliding in Washington by John Markoff at the New York Times, which quotes Stanford Law Prof Mark Lemley on pending Congressional patent legislation as follows:""I have to say I'm frankly astonished that apportionment has been this controversial," said Mark A. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution … [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 9:59 pm
This is truly what Mark Tushnet has described as "constitutional hardball," and yet the legislature apparently is unaware that the game, like Congress itself, is being played. [read post]
