Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 6621 - 6640 of 21,693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
  The IPKat can’t quite remember…) A pretty picture Well, happily, now the IPKat has had a chance to peruse, read (and mark and inwardly digest, if not quite yet learn) both documents, and so now, dear readers, he is happy to tell you about the Lilly v JAI case. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
™  In State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:19 am by John Elwood
This week’s conference marks the theoretical “cutoff” for grants that could be argued this term without expedited briefing. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:25 pm by Nikki Siesel
 In the recent decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), Central Garden & Pet Company v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:58 am by Verena von Bomhard
Art. 8(5) EUTMR, whereby the owner of a mark with a reputation can prevent the registration of a mark the use of which would take unfair advantage of the reputation, states that such use must be “without due cause”. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 6:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In any event, plaintiff failed to state a cause of action under Judiciary Law § 487 against Berkowitz. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
In the Anheuser-Busch case, the importation from the USA of bottled beer under the BUDWEISER mark for use and sale in US military and diplomatic establishments within the UK did not entitle the plaintiff to establish what Lord Oliver later stated was the first element of a passing off claim. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 11:39 am by Amy Howe
The 6-3 ruling in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
In a case involving a whiskey bottle dog toy with important findings for retailers and brand protection, the Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit’s rulings on trademark infringement and trademark dilution in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:56 am by Richard M. Re
And Hyatt ignored the strong stare decisis requirements that marked Casey. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, to the extent Shubaderov and Egorov seek an award of treble damages in the context of the legal malpractice cause of action, it fails to state a cause of action pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 (see Pszeniczny v Horn, 193 AD3d 1091; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840). [read post]