Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 6621 - 6640
of 22,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2019, 6:43 am
The Board here ruled that this standard applies to product packaging.The Board deemed it appropriate to apply a two-step approach to the determination of genericness similar to the approach applied for word marks: first, determine the genus of goods at issue; second, determine whether the relevant consumers regard the matter sought to be registered as a category or type of trade dress for the goods. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
The spring release of Canada’s Digital Charter by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Minister Navdeep Bains foreshadowed a commitment to new privacy rules and the implementation of a national sales tax on digital services was only a matter of time. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 5:30 am
Upon further appeal, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in this decision concluded that the Superior Court had erred in remanding the case for a new trial on damages given that, under the “general-verdict rule” adopted by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in the case of Halper v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
It now appears that the positions have been reversed, with the mother country adopting robust judicial review just as the younger inventor of that institution has become more cautious in its use. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
So what are the unstated, but possible implications of the Court’s ruling? [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
So what are the unstated, but possible implications of the Court’s ruling? [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:27 am
What will drive solution(s): rules, data analytics, AI, other? [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
It is clear that Congress adopted the split-enforcement structure in the OSH Act in order to achieve a greater separation of functions than exists in a conventional unitary agency. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:58 am
Are the State’s Propositions of Law Adopted? [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:23 am
§ 50-19.1 (2017) (“Notwithstanding any other pending claims filed in the same action, a party may appeal from an order or judgment adjudicating . . . child custody . . . if the order or judgment would otherwise be a final order or judgment within the meaning of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54(b), but for the other pending claims in the same action. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:18 pm
On the other hand, a ruling for Kansas might prompt more states to consider abolishing the insanity defense and adopting a rule similar to the Kansas law. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 10:39 am
As an initial matter, he says, the Supreme Court’s cases make this clear. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
The Report and recommendation were adopted and incorporated in an order by the district court. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:42 am
This program is based on the Cybersecurity Law adopted on 2016. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:15 am
The argument should give us a good idea how the justices are leaning on that topic in this relatively simple matter. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:26 am
In the absence of strict limitations,the cited documents were deemed to be have been made publicly available.On the subject of legitimate expectations, the Board ruled that this principle applies to disadvantageous consequences resulting from the omission of procedural steps. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 12:03 am
A cornerstone of judicial cooperation in criminal matters, this network is allegedly being exploited by a commercial company operating on the European market (hereinafter name, for the purposes of this entry, The Company), in order to provide, against payment, a speedy and efficient service to actual or prospective employers, wishing to access the criminal records of current employees or prospect hires. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm
Florida adopted the rule and recognized it in several cases. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
The new Article 15 (formerly Article 11) of the European Copyright Directive was adopted by the European Council in April 2019. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 11:51 am
As a constitutional matter, the answer depends on whether the interpreter thinks national injunctions are consistent with Article III. [read post]
