Search for: "R G v. G S" Results 6621 - 6640 of 6,912
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2008, 2:21 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Legal Services Commission v Rasool [2008] EWCA Civ 154 (05 March 2008) Revenue & Customs v Dunwood Travel Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 174 (07 March 2008) AIC Ltd v Marine Pilot Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 175 (07 March 2008) Research In Motion UK Ltd v Visto Corporation [2008] EWCA Civ 153 (06 March 2008) City Inn (Jersey) Ltd v Ten Trinity Square Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 156 (06 March 2008) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Bright,… [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 9:53 pm
District Court for the District of New Jersey (Judge Peter G. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 9:17 am
Opinion below (3rd Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply __________________ Docket: 07-839 Case name: Arpaio v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:05 am
The Court asked for the federal government’s views in two pending cases: Amschwand v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 8:35 am
Whilst on the Childrens Act 1989,   G, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Southwark [2007] EWCA Civ 1506   - permission given to appeal the Judicial Review on the issue of how far a social services assessment is a finding of fact capable of giving rise to a s.20 duty. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:41 pm
G, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Southwark [2007] EWCA Civ 1506   on accommodation under s.20 Children Act 1989. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 12:44 pm
"  Although BSI's guidance document was funded by the UK Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills, it is only a guidance document and should not be treated as an "official" British standard. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:33 pm
The government’s stay application (07A677), filed with Chief Justice John G. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:47 pm
  Citing one of the Court’s most prominent modern rulings declining to allow a right to sue under a federal civil rights law (Alexander v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 12:56 pm
  That concept, most closely identified with the jurisprudence of Justice Antonin Scalia, is a basic rationale behind Wednesday’s 7-2 decision in Danforth v. [read post]