Search for: "See v. See"
Results 6621 - 6640
of 121,990
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2023, 8:16 am
That’s known as the Doctrine of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies (see, e.g., McKart v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:30 am
” (But see below for an interesting caveat here.) [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:05 am
U.S. proponents of limits on the Court’s jurisdiction see the ICC as a sword, threatening U.S. soldiers (and civilian leaders) with harm. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
See Pet.11, 24-27. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:01 am
” “The Pellegrini defendants have met their prima facie burden demonstrating that they did not depart from the requisite standard of care (see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 49-50 [2015] citing Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347 [2012]). [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am
See Nico Constantijn Antonius Samara v Stive Jean-Paul Dan [2021] HKCFI 1078[41]; Yan Yu Ying v Leung Wing Hei [2021] HKCFI 3160 and Huobi Asia Limited & Anor v Chen Boliang & Anor [2020] HKCFI 2750. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
In particular, the SEC chose not to require corresponding quarterly disclosures and a cooling-off period with respect to the adoption of Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangements by the issuer, preferring to take a wait-and-see approach. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 3:49 pm
I look forward to seeing what they have to say. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm
Circuit that’s plainly out of step with recent Supreme Court decisions, which show less deference to agency authority (like the Axon decision just last week, or last year’s West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:14 pm
Jonathan Witmer-Rich (Cleveland State) posted this to a discussion list that I'm on, and graciously allowed me to forward it; it's about today's U.S. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm
See Doe v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 11:00 am
The court explains: Here, even if the defendant had been negligent in his representation of the plaintiff in connection with the underlying matters, viewing the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88), it failed to plead specific factual allegations demonstrating that, but for the defendant’s alleged negligence, there would have been a more favorable outcome in the underlying matters or that the plaintiff would not have… [read post]
Do Law Schools Truly Have to Worry About Students Not Being Able to Handle Real-World Disagreements?
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am
During an oral argument at the Supreme Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch initiated this bizarre exchange, as reported in Slate:During oral arguments in 303 Creative v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:08 am
This arose in the case of Pricol Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 8:54 am
—Homer 1Balogh v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 8:38 am
See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:59 am
Mathews v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:04 am
For more on these restrictions, see here: https://bit.ly/3mu3rDo.This article was originally published on April 14, 2023 at First Reference Talks.Vey Willetts LLP is an Ottawa-based employment and labour law firm that provides timely and cost-effective legal advice to help employees and employers resolve workplace issues in Ottawa and across Ontario. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 5:30 am
I dug a bit further, to see if anyone has ever used the phrase "stripped of its baubles. [read post]
