Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 6621 - 6640 of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2018, 10:15 am by Eric Goldman
” SB 1121 proposes renumber this section as 1798.120(c) but doesn’t fix the drafting error. 1798.140(b): “an individual’s deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)” isn’t data, it’s material from which data can be obtained. 1798.140(o)(2): I think the language “‘Publicly available’ does not include consumer information that is deidentified or aggregate consumer information” meant “personal… [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 1:25 pm by Greg Herman-Giddens
This limitation affects elective deferrals to Section 401(k) plans, Section 403(b) plans, and the federal government’s Thrift Savings Plan. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  That’s probably not what our trading partners wanted, but it’s what they got—both for §43(a)(1)(B) and for §2, after California Innovations. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
 But just as Justice Scalia’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The discipline involved Groia’s defence in R. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 2:09 pm
  Selya says it is okay under prejudice and notes that under United States v. [read post]