Search for: "State v. Fair" Results 6621 - 6640 of 27,455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2012, 1:34 pm by Michelle Yeary
As people we strive to be honest and fair. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:01 pm by Christina Tellado and Deisy Castro
Today, the California Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated opinion in Troester v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am by Adam Baker
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 2:11 am
8Circuit.png On habeas review of state trial concerning sexual abuse of a child, Eighth Circuit concludes video-taped testimonial statements of the minor to a police officer and social worker describing the details of the abuse were admissible despite the inability of the minor to recall the events during her trial testimony since she testified at trial and the defense was provided a full and fair opportunity to cross-examine her; the minor was not made… [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:40 am by Alex Stamm, Center for Justice
Fair Federal Sentencing Last week, the ACLU’s Criminal Law Reform Project filed an amicus brief in Hill v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am by John Elwood
Certiorari-stage documents Petition for certiorari Memorandum for the United States   Wetzel v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:37 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
Recently, the a Federal Court in the State of New York was asked to decide whether the Spike television show, “Pros v. [read post]
” This is the first redistricting in Georgia since the 2013 Supreme Court decision Shelby County v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:43 am by Charlotte Bamford, Olswang LLP
 The Court cited Article 249 EC which states that ‘a decision shall be binding in its entirety upon those to whom it is addressed’ and the case of AssiDomän Kraft Products AB v Commission of the European Communities [1999] ECR I-5363 (Case C-310/97). [read post]