Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 6621 - 6640 of 8,956
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2009, 10:26 am
  The Fifth Circuit said that the district court erred by relying on other district court decisions -- including the lower court decision in Connecticut v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:09 am
United States First Circuit, 08/04/2010 IMS Health Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:21 pm by Erin Miller
  After nine months at the Court, he knew better than to think that any justice would ever write his own first drafts! [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
Plaintiff is a "national cable television network dedicated to reporting on legal and judicial systems of the United States, the 50 states, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 11:01 pm by Dennis Crouch
The PTAB-District Court Balance of Power In fact, the issue of court-agency power allocation was central to the whole case. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:43 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This was as reckless an act of judicial defiance as we have seen from any district court in the past three years. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:28 am by Russ Bensing
Another way was suggested by the 8th District last week in State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
Ice, to the Ohio Supreme Court’s refusal in State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held below, or leaves immunity intact, as the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 11:05 am by Eugene Volokh
[alleging the accuser lied in the proceedings can thus go forward, holds the Connecticut Supreme Court] From the syllabus of today's Connecticut Supreme Court decision in Khan v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:35 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Attorneys for the United States have filed their brief in the matter of Ancient Coin Collectors Guild v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]